[1] G. Brinkmann, K. Coolsaet, J. Goedgebeur, and H. M´elot, House of Graphs: a database of interesting graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 161 (2013), no. 1-2, 311–314.
[2] M. Chellali, T.W. Haynes, S.T. Hedetniemi, and A.A. McRae, Roman {2}-domination, Discrete Appl. Math. 204 (2016), 22–28.
[3] E.J. Cockayne, P.A. Dreyer, Jr., S.M. Hedetniemi, and S.T. Hedetniemi, Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Math. 278 (2004), no. 1-3, 11–22.
[4] M.A. Henning and S.T Hedetniemi, Defending the Roman Empire–A new strategy, Discrete Math. 266 (2003), no. 1-3, 239–251.
[5] M.A. Henning and W.F. Klostermeyer, Italian domination in trees, Discrete Appl. Math. 217 (2017), no. part 3, 557–564.
[7] B. McKay, Description of graph6, sparse6 and digraph6 encodings, 2015, http://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/data/formats.txt.
[8] J. Petersen, Die Theorie der regul¨aren graphs, Acta Math. 15 (1891), no. 1, 193–220.
[9] W. A. Stein and et al., Sage Mathematics Software (Version 8.6.4), The Sage Development Team, 2021,
http://www.sagemath.org.
[10] I. Stewart, Defend the Roman Empire!, Scientific American (1999), 136–138.
[11] L. Volkmann, The Italian domatic number of a digraph, Commun. Comb. Optim. 4 (2019), no. 1, 61–70.
[12] L. Volkmann, The Roman {2}-domatic number of graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 258 (2019), 235–241.