<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Communications in Combinatorics and Optimization</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2538-2128</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A full Nesterov-Todd step interior-point method for circular cone optimization</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>83</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>102</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">13554</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22049/cco.2016.13554</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Behrouz</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kheirfam</LastName>
<Affiliation>Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>03</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In this paper, we present a full Newton step feasible interior-point method for circular cone optimization by using Euclidean Jordan algebra. The search direction is based on the Nesterov-Todd scaling scheme, and only full-Newton step is used at each iteration. Furthermore, we derive the iteration bound that coincides with the currently best known iteration bound for small-update methods.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Circular cone optimization</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Full-Newton step</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Interior-point methods</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Euclidean Jordan algebra</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://comb-opt.azaruniv.ac.ir/article_13554_9900ae75931b4aada179ad211a6b3724.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Communications in Combinatorics and Optimization</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2538-2128</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Hypo-efficient domination and hypo-unique domination</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>103</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>116</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">13553</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22049/cco.2016.13553</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Vladimir</FirstName>
					<LastName>Samodivkin</LastName>
<Affiliation>University of Architecture, Civil Еngineering and Geodesy;
Department of  Mathematics</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>11</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>For a graph $G$ let $\gamma (G)$ be its domination number. We define a graph G to be (i)  a  hypo-efficient domination graph (or  a  hypo-$\mathcal{ED}$ graph) if $G$ has no  efficient dominating set (EDS)  but every graph formed by removing a single vertex from $G$ has at least one EDS, and (ii)  a hypo-unique domination graph (a hypo-$\mathcal{UD}$ graph) if $G$ has at least two  minimum dominating sets, but $G-v$ has a unique minimum dominating set  for each $v\in V(G)$. We  show that each  hypo-$\mathcal{UD}$ graph $G$ of order at least $3$  is connected  and $\gamma(G-v) &lt;\gamma(G)$ for all $v \in V$. We obtain a tight  upper bound  on the order of a hypo-$\mathcal{P}$ graph in terms of the domination number and maximum degree of the graph, where $\mathcal{P} \in \{\mathcal{UD}, \mathcal{ED}\}$.  Families of  circulant graphs, which achieve these bounds, are presented. We also prove that the bondage number of any  hypo-$\mathcal{UD}$ graph is not more than the minimum degree plus one.  </Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Domination number</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Efficient Domination</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">unique domination</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">hypo-property</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://comb-opt.azaruniv.ac.ir/article_13553_2afb7e049e6640f7612ba8d81256137c.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Communications in Combinatorics and Optimization</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2538-2128</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The sum-annihilating essential ideal graph of a commutative ring</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>117</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>135</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">13555</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22049/cco.2016.13555</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abbas</FirstName>
					<LastName>Alilou</LastName>
<Affiliation>Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Jafar</FirstName>
					<LastName>Amjadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>10</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Let $R$ be a commutative ring with identity. An ideal $I$ of a ring $R$ is called an annihilating ideal if there exists $r\in R\setminus \{0\}$ such that $Ir=(0)$ and an ideal $I$ of $R$ is called an essential ideal if $I$ has non-zero intersection with every other non-zero ideal of $R$. The sum-annihilating essential ideal graph of $R$, denoted by $\mathcal{AE}_R$, is a graph whose vertex set is the set of all non-zero annihilating ideals and two vertices $I$ and $J$ are adjacent whenever ${\rm Ann}(I)+{\rm Ann}(J)$ is an essential ideal. In this paper we initiate the study of the sum-annihilating essential ideal graph. We first characterize all rings whose sum-annihilating essential ideal graph are stars or complete graphs and then establish sharp bounds on domination number of this graph. Furthermore determine all isomorphism classes of Artinian rings whose sum-annihilating essential ideal graph has genus zero or one.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Commutative rings</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">annihilating ideal</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">essential ideal</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">genus of a graph</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://comb-opt.azaruniv.ac.ir/article_13555_3f74eb186e2bee9fefcb8aa541b1f23c.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Communications in Combinatorics and Optimization</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2538-2128</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>On trees and the multiplicative sum Zagreb index</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>137</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>148</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">13574</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22049/cco.2016.13574</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mehdi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Eliasi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Dept. of Mathematics, Khansar Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science,
Khansar, Iran,</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ghalavand</LastName>
<Affiliation>Dept. of Mathematics, Khansar Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science,
Khansar, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>28</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>For a  graph $G$ with  edge set $E(G)$, the multiplicative sum Zagreb index of $G$ is defined as $\Pi^*(G)=\Pi_{uv\in E(G)}[d_G(u)+d_G(v)]$,  where $d_G(v)$ is the degree of vertex $v$ in $G$. In this paper, we first introduce some graph transformations that  decrease this index. In application,  we identify the fourteen class of trees, with the first through fourteenth smallest multiplicative sum Zagreb indices  among all trees of  order $n\geq 13$.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Multiplicative Sum Zagreb Index</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Graph Transformation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Branching Point</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">trees</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://comb-opt.azaruniv.ac.ir/article_13574_13979e274d477e710da9e35a059bc605.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Communications in Combinatorics and Optimization</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2538-2128</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Twin minus domination in directed graphs</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>149</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>164</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">13575</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22049/cco.2016.13575</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Maryam</FirstName>
					<LastName>Atapour</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Mathematics
 Faculty of basic sciences
University of  Bonab 
 Bonab, Iran,  Po. Box: 5551761167</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abdollah</FirstName>
					<LastName>Khodkar</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Mathematics
University of West Georgia
Carrollton, GA 30118, USA</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Let $D=(V,A)$ be a finite simple directed graph. A function $f:V\longrightarrow \{-1,0,1\}$ is called a twin minus dominating function  if $f(N^-[v])\ge 1$ and $f(N^+[v])\ge 1$ for each vertex $v\in V$. The twin minus domination number of $D$ is $\gamma_{-}^*(D)=\min\{w(f)\mid f \mbox{ is a twin minus dominating function of } D\}$. In this paper, we initiate the study of twin minus domination numbers in digraphs and present some lower bounds for $\gamma_{-}^*(D)$ in terms of the order, size and maximum and minimum in-degrees and out-degrees.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">twin domination in digraphs</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">minus domination in graphs</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">twin minus domination in digraphs</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://comb-opt.azaruniv.ac.ir/article_13575_b0af46e588dfc0fa0951f816023dd6df.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Communications in Combinatorics and Optimization</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2538-2128</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Signed total Roman k-domination in directed graphs</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>165</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>178</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">13576</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22049/cco.2016.13576</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Nasrin</FirstName>
					<LastName>Dehgardi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Sirjan University of Technology, Sirjan 78137, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Lutz</FirstName>
					<LastName>Volkmann</LastName>
<Affiliation>Lehrstuhl II fur Mathematik, 
RWTH Aachen University, 
52056 Aachen, Germany</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>13</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Let $D$ be a finite and simple digraph with vertex set $V(D)$. A signed total Roman $k$-dominating function (STR$k$DF) on $D$ is a function $f:V(D)\rightarrow\{-1, 1, 2\}$ satisfying the conditions that (i) $\sum_{x\in N^{-}(v)}f(x)\ge k$ for each $v\in V(D)$, where $N^{-}(v)$ consists of all vertices of $D$ from which arcs go into $v$, and (ii) every vertex $u$ for which $f(u)=-1$ has an inner neighbor $v$ for which $f(v)=2$. The weight of an STR$k$DF $f$ is $\omega(f)=\sum_{v\in V (D)}f(v)$. The signed total Roman $k$-domination number $\gamma^{k}_{stR}(D)$ of $D$ is the minimum weight of an STR$k$DF on $D$. In this paper we initiate the study of the signed total Roman $k$-domination number of digraphs, and we present different bounds on $\gamma^{k}_{stR}(D)$. In addition, we determine the signed total Roman $k$-domination number of some classes of digraphs. Some of our results are extensions of known properties of the signed total Roman $k$-domination number $\gamma^{k}_{stR}(G)$ of graphs $G$.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Digraph‎</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">‎Signed total Roman k-dominating function‎</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">‎Signed total ‎Rom‎an k-domination‎</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://comb-opt.azaruniv.ac.ir/article_13576_afdcd0fac389c7cc1b729f716dbbce32.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
