<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Communications in Combinatorics and Optimization</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2538-2128</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Sufficient conditions on the zeroth-order general Randic index for maximally edge-connected digraphs</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>13</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">13514</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22049/cco.2016.13514</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Lutz</FirstName>
					<LastName>Volkmann</LastName>
<Affiliation>RWTH Aachen University</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Let $D$ be a finite and simple digraph with vertex set $V(D)$. For a vertex $v\in V(D)$, the degree of $v$, denoted by $d(v)$, is defined as the minimum value of its out-degree $d^+(v)$ and its in-degree $d^-(v)$. Now let $D$ be a digraph with minimum degree $\delta\ge 1$ and edge-connectivity $\lambda$. If $\alpha$ is real number, then, analogously to graphs, we define the zeroth-order general Randi\&#039;{c} index by $\sum_{x\in V(D)}(d(x))^{\alpha}$. A digraph is maximally edge-connected if $\lambda=\delta$. In this paper, we present sufficient conditions for digraphs to be maximally edge-connected in terms of the zeroth-order general Randi\&#039;{c} index, the order and the minimum degree when $\alpha &lt;0$, $0&lt;\alpha &lt;1$ or $1&lt;\alpha\le 2$. Using the associated digraph of a graph, we show that our results include some corresponding known results on graphs. </Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Digraphs</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">edge-connectivity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Maximally edge-connected digraphs</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Zeroth-order general Randic index</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://comb-opt.azaruniv.ac.ir/article_13514_2c29013911bbc87b1dc4be81c6823349.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Communications in Combinatorics and Optimization</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2538-2128</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The minus k-domination numbers in graphs</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>15</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>28</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">13534</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22049/cco.2016.13534</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>N.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Dehgardi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Sirjan University of Technology, Sirjan 78137, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>11</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>For any integer $k\ge 1$, a minus $k$-dominating function is a function $f : V \rightarrow \{-1,0, 1\}$ satisfying $\sum_{w\in N[v]} f(w)\ge k$ for every $v\in V(G)$, where $N(v) =\{u \in V(G)\mid uv\in E(G)\}$ and $N[v] =N(v)\cup \{v\}$. The minimum of the values of $\sum_{v\in V(G)}f(v)$, taken over all minus $k$-dominating functions $f$, is called the minus $k$-domination number and is denoted by $\gamma^-_{k}(G)$. In this paper, we introduce the study of minus $k$-domination in graphs and  present several sharp lower bounds on the minus $k$-domination number for general graphs.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">‎Minus $k$-dominating function‎</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">‎minus‎ $k$-domination number‎</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">graph</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://comb-opt.azaruniv.ac.ir/article_13534_842d7e5cc29617870d3b17a192a370e4.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Communications in Combinatorics and Optimization</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2538-2128</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>New bounds on proximity and remoteness in graphs</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>29</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>41</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">13543</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22049/cco.2016.13543</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>P.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Dankelmann</LastName>
<Affiliation>University of Johannesburg</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>27</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The average distance of a vertex $v$ of a connected graph $G$ is the arithmetic mean of the distances from $v$ to all other vertices of $G$. The proximity $\pi(G)$ and the remoteness $\rho(G)$ of $G$ are defined as the minimum and maximum, respectively, average distance of the vertices of $G$. In this paper we investigate the difference between proximity or remoteness and the classical distance parameters diameter and radius. Among other results we show that in a graph of order $n$ and minimum degree $\delta$ the difference between diameter and proximity and the difference between radius and proximity cannot exceed $\frac{9n}{4(\delta+1)}+c_1$ and $\frac{3n}{4(\delta+1)}+c_2$, respectively, for constants $c_1$ and $c_2$ which depend on $\delta$ but not on $n$.  These bounds improve bounds by Aouchiche and Hansen \cite{AouHan2011} in terms of order alone by about a factor of $\frac{3}{\delta+1}$. We further give lower bounds on the remoteness in terms of diameter or radius. Finally we show that the average distance of a graph, i.e., the average of the distances between all pairs of vertices, cannot exceed twice the proximity.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">diameter</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">radius</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">proximity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">remoteness</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">distance</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://comb-opt.azaruniv.ac.ir/article_13543_99e338e777d53b2fb451bb25a4de0578.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Communications in Combinatorics and Optimization</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2538-2128</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The convex domination subdivision number of a graph</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>43</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>56</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">13544</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22049/cco.2016.13544</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Dettlaff</LastName>
<Affiliation>Gdańsk University of Technology</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kosari</LastName>
<Affiliation>Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Lemańska</LastName>
<Affiliation>Gdańsk University of Technology</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>S.M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sheikholeslami</LastName>
<Affiliation>Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Let $G=(V,E)$ be a simple graph. A set $D\subseteq V$ is a dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V\setminus D$ has at least one neighbor in $D$. The distance $d_G(u,v)$ between two vertices $u$ and $v$ is the length of a shortest $(u,v)$-path in $G$. An $(u,v)$-path of length $d_G(u,v)$ is called an $(u,v)$-geodesic. A set $X\subseteq V$ is convex in $G$ if vertices from all $(a, b)$-geodesics belong to $X$ for any two vertices $a,b\in X$. A set $X$ is a convex dominating set if it is convex and dominating set. The {\em convex domination number} $\gamma_{\rm con}(G)$ of a graph $G$ equals the minimum cardinality of a  convex dominating set in $G$. {\em The convex domination subdivision number} sd$_{\gamma_{\rm con}}(G)$ is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (each edge in $G$ can be subdivided at most once) in order to increase the convex domination number. In this paper we initiate the study of convex domination subdivision number and we establish upper bounds for it. </Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">convex dominating set</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">convex domination number</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">convex domination subdivision number</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://comb-opt.azaruniv.ac.ir/article_13544_b044108d0b0eedf90a89cf1f47c4f8e0.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Communications in Combinatorics and Optimization</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2538-2128</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>More skew-equienergetic digraphs</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>57</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>73</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">13545</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22049/cco.2016.13545</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ch.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Adiga</LastName>
<Affiliation>University of Mysore</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Rakshith</FirstName>
					<LastName>B R</LastName>
<Affiliation>University of Mysore</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>17</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Two digraphs of same order are said to be skew-equienergetic if their skew energies are equal. One of the open problems proposed by Li and Lian was to construct non-cospectral skew-equienergetic digraphs on &lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; vertices. Recently this problem was solved by Ramane et al. In this  paper, we give some new methods to construct new skew-equienergetic digraphs.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">energy of a graph</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">skew energy of a digraph</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">equienergetic graphs</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">skew-equienergetic digraphs</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://comb-opt.azaruniv.ac.ir/article_13545_0f42ad1856ecb7c77844ab63bd68ed35.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Communications in Combinatorics and Optimization</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2538-2128</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Bounds on the restrained Roman domination number of a graph</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>75</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>82</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">13556</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22049/cco.2016.13556</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>H.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Abdollahzadeh Ahangar</LastName>
<Affiliation>Babol Noshirvani  University of Technology</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>S.R.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mirmehdipour</LastName>
<Affiliation>Babol Noshirvani University of Technology</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>08</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>A {\em Roman dominating function} on a graph $G$ is a function $f:V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ satisfying the condition that every vertex $u$ for which $f(u) = 0$ is adjacent to at least one vertex $v$ for which $f(v) =2$. A {\em restrained Roman dominating} function $f$ is a Roman dominating function if the vertices with label 0 induce a subgraph with no isolated vertex. The weight of a restrained Roman dominating function is the value $\omega(f)=\sum_{u\in V(G)} f(u)$. The minimum weight of a restrained  Roman dominating function of $G$ is called the { \em restrained  Roman domination number} of $G$ and denoted by $\gamma_{rR}(G)$. In this paper we establish some sharp bounds for this parameter. </Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Roman dominating function</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Roman domination number</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">restrained Roman dominating function</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">restrained Roman domination number</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://comb-opt.azaruniv.ac.ir/article_13556_af7da9ddc41c8343edb4835aaab47c2c.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
