%0 Journal Article
%T Hypo-efficient domination and hypo-unique domination
%J Communications in Combinatorics and Optimization
%I Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University
%Z 2538-2128
%A Samodivkin, Vladimir
%D 2016
%\ 12/01/2016
%V 1
%N 2
%P 103-116
%! Hypo-efficient domination and hypo-unique domination
%K Domination number
%K Efficient Domination
%K unique domination
%K hypo-property
%R 10.22049/cco.2016.13553
%X For a graph $G$ let $\gamma (G)$ be its domination number. We define a graph G to be (i) a hypo-efficient domination graph (or a hypo-$\mathcal{ED}$ graph) if $G$ has no efficient dominating set (EDS) but every graph formed by removing a single vertex from $G$ has at least one EDS, and (ii) a hypo-unique domination graph (a hypo-$\mathcal{UD}$ graph) if $G$ has at least two minimum dominating sets, but $G-v$ has a unique minimum dominating set for each $v\in V(G)$. We show that each hypo-$\mathcal{UD}$ graph $G$ of order at least $3$ is connected and $\gamma(G-v) <\gamma(G)$ for all $v \in V$. We obtain a tight upper bound on the order of a hypo-$\mathcal{P}$ graph in terms of the domination number and maximum degree of the graph, where $\mathcal{P} \in \{\mathcal{UD}, \mathcal{ED}\}$. Families of circulant graphs, which achieve these bounds, are presented. We also prove that the bondage number of any hypo-$\mathcal{UD}$ graph is not more than the minimum degree plus one.
%U https://comb-opt.azaruniv.ac.ir/article_13553_2afb7e049e6640f7612ba8d81256137c.pdf